|
Ishani Tewari Ph.D. Candidate Department of Economics Brown University |
||
|
|
|
|
|
CONTACT Brown University Department of Economics Box B 64 Waterman Street Providence, RI 02912 |
RESEARCH
FIELDS Growth and Development Banking Applied Microeconomics JOB
MARKET PAPER Home Sweet Home: Financial Development
and Asset Inequality There is broad consensus that financial
development boosts overall economic growth, but do some groups benefit
disproportionately? I use a quasi-experimental setting provided by U.S. branch
banking deregulation to explore this question in the context of asset
inequality, specifically access to homeownership. Branching deregulation
removed geographic restrictions on banks' ability to open branches,
representing an important episode of financial development which can also be
regarded as plausibly exogenous to mortgage markets. Exploiting cross-state
and cross-time variation in branching, and piecing together several
micro-level datasets on mortgages and banks, I find an increase in overall
homeownership and mortgage lending. These effects are strongest for the
middle quantiles of the income distribution, as
well as for black households and younger households. Down payments, which
tend to be the binding constraint for new homeowners, decrease as well. These
results are driven only by commercial banks, the specific financial
institutions subject to the policy. Despite the expansion of credit to
marginal borrowers, there are no increases in foreclosures following
deregulation. Further evidence suggests that the expansion of branch networks
allowed banks to exploit economies of scale and invest in screening
technologies, enabling faster and more accurate assessment of borrower risk,
and ultimately allowing lenders to extend credit to previously excluded
borrowers. OTHER
RESEARCH Is Small Beautiful? Evidence from India’s Product Reservation
Policy for Small Industry (Awarded
Kauffman Dissertation Fellowship) The
preponderance of small firms in less-developed countries is striking. An influential body of work suggests that
the firm size distribution in less-developed countries, especially its thick
left tail, reflects the misallocation of resources arising from distortionary
polices and institutions. In this
paper, I assess one important class of potentially distortionary policies--
government support for small enterprises.
India's product reservation policy presents a unique quasi-experimental
setting to estimate the impact of this type of government regulation on the
manufacturing sector. The policy
mandated that certain products were “reserved” for manufacture by small
firms, specifically firms with capital below a certain threshold. Since 1997,
this investment ceiling has been removed for different products at different
times. Exploiting variation in the choice and sequencing of goods subject to
this “dereservation,” I find that firm productivity increases by 3% and
output increases by 5% once size restrictions are lifted. The effects are
disproportionately higher for industries with larger economies of scale, and
for states where institutions make it is easier to increase firm size.
Probing further into the channels behind this effect, I find that although
productivity increases across most of the industry firm size distribution,
bigger firms grow disproportionately more both in terms of productivity and
size. Additionally, the concentration
of market share increases following the policy. There is no change in the
rate of new entry, and new entrants are not disproportionately larger or more
productive. These results suggest that
older, larger incumbents expand and move into the manufacture of products
once the size restrictions governing the manufacture of these products are
removed. Mortgage modifications and the cost of
credit (in
progress, joint with Wenli Li and Michelle
White) |
|
|
` |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
│ BROWN UNIVERSITY